Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge B. Vargas Museum and Filipiniana Research Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Yellow Dingo&#160;(talk) 00:11, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Jorge B. Vargas Museum and Filipiniana Research Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable subunit of a university. Delete per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. KDS4444 (talk) 02:46, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 13:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 02:46, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep  This is an actual museum.  WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES has nothing to do with an actual museum housed on the campus of a University.  Move to KEEP this on the grounds that the Nom is  mistaken.E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I added a dispositive source. This should not have been necessary.  We do not delete actual, significant art museums with significant collections.  We tag them for sourcing.  And we run a WP:BEFORE check before taking the m to AfD.  That informs us that they are real.  end of Rant, but, honestly, AfD could try the patience of a saint.  I am not a saint. .E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, meets WP:GEOFEAT, note and sympathise with 's frustration but remember WP:BURDEN falls on the article creator to provide sources in the first place (why can't article creators provide enough sources, i do (coola says modestly), oh, and heres another source that may be useful - Research Paper: The Jorge B. Vargas Art Collection as a Microcosm of Art during the Commonwealth Coolabahapple (talk) 03:00, 9 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.