Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Fellipe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that enough sources have been found to show evidence of notability. Mojo Hand (talk) 16:12, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

Jorge Fellipe

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG. No significant sourcing found in WP:BEFORE nor coverage in the sources given on the page, if reliable. Was previously G5'd as a creation of Losail, so salting might be in order. Iseult  Δx parlez moi 16:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football,  and Brazil.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. I was expecting something given his career in Brazil and Portugal but could not find anything beyond stats databases. GiantSnowman 08:22, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by Robby. GiantSnowman 20:36, 20 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep This guy has played for top clubs around the world there are multiple sources to be found; per, , , , , . There are frigging loads of hits, I doubt  did a real WP:BEFORE, and baring in mind the mass multiple nominations to AfD, might I suggest you should monitor this guy. Did you look at his career, there are a few big clubs in there. I highly doubt this would fail GNG. Govvy (talk) 09:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I show no significant sourcing within the first four pages of google search results. The last four sources you've cited are not significant coverage, topping out at two sentence-clauses maximum in the fifth. Youtube is not a good reference per WP:VIDEOREF. I might give you the first only, but I'd argue that even if it qualifies, one source regarding transfers is not enough to qualify under WP:GNG. Regarding mass nominations, see previous deletion logs of the page. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 10:03, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The above sources are not significant coverage, they are transfer news etc. GiantSnowman 19:37, 19 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment I've expanded the article, but seriously the guy played in Portugal for CD Aves and was even part of the squad that won 2017–18 Taça de Portugal all be it a small part in the final., this is a nice interview,  I seriously feel this AfD shouldn't be here for this journeyman, I am absolutely convinced that I am the only one doing the WP:BEFORE! Govvy (talk) 09:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment These sources from Globo look decent:, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:07, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - I searched for online Portuguese-language sources, and almost everything is trivial (lots of transfer announcements and match reports, but very little coverage of his exploits). This interview is somewhat detailed, but it is with the subject of the article so has little value towards meeting WP:GNG. I'm generally only finding sources from the last 5-6 years, so perhaps his early career (e.g., at Santos) generated more in-depth coverage, but I haven't been able to locate it online. Jogurney (talk) 12:53, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I also found this interview which covers his exploits with Madureira (led to his signing with Atlético Paranaense). There are dozens of Portuguese-language articles like these, most with less substance, but I'm not convinced it all adds up to meeting the GNG. Jogurney (talk) 13:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Reply Multiple sources... Well they all add up if you ask me, the more there are the more he passes GNG. :/ Govvy (talk) 14:09, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: all of these sources are either database entries or interviews, which don't qualify under independence concerns or significance of coverage. No progress towards WP:GNG so far. I'm looking for Portuguese (country) sources; Globo is infamously unreliable, at least when I do post on r/soccer. Iseult   Δx parlez moi 17:56, 20 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, per sources found above.-- Mvqr (talk) 16:23, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes GNG. Simione001 (talk) 01:05, 22 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.