Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Luis Diaz Granados Lugo (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:56, 9 November 2019 (UTC)

Jorge Luis Diaz Granados Lugo
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Autobiography that fails WP:BASIC, fails WP:AUTHOR as all his works are self-published, fails WP:ACTOR because his role was in a short film produced by his fellow university students and he is uncredited in it, fails WP:CREATIVE for a non-notable local competition which was only held once... a recreation of an article previously deleted twice, and not addressing any of the problems of a complete lack of notability and sources. Would suggest that this article name, "JL Diazgranados" and "J.L. Diazgranados" are all salted to stop this pointless recreation over and over again. Richard3120 (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Richard3120 (talk) 21:02, 2 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Wikipedia needs to enforce its anti-autobiography rules. This will mark the third deletion this year.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:30, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:30, 3 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt per nom. If Diazgrandos establishes notability later on in the future, the article can be drafted and accepted by an AfC reviewer to ensure that it doesn't wind up here again.  Willsome 4 29  (say hey or see my edits!) 14:22, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete six out of the nine sources are from Facebook and YouTube and thus are unreliable. Out of the three remaining sources one is from Blogspot which unreliable per WP:RSP. The remaining two sources are both in Spanish but which are allowed on Wikipedia but there are no translations and no way for me to verify them. This source on the article seems reliable but the other is a brief overview of what looks to be a video game. These two sources do not provide any WP:SIGCOV and thus is not notable to have his own article. Also all seven of these unreliable sources are likley to violate WP:BLP.   Spy-cicle💥   Talk? 20:35, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and WP:SALT. All of the sourcing are social media such as Facebook, YouTube, and blogs. Thsi is as spammy as they come. I remind the gentle reader that we are a charity and an encyclopedia, not a free web host. It was somehow recreated after two deletions: Cartago delenda est. Bearian (talk) 14:14, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
 * To be completely fair to the creator, El Informador is a genuine newspaper and reliable source, as Spy-cicle noted above. But it's the only RS, and all it does is confirm that the subject was part of a team that won a one-off non-notable competition some years ago. That's not enough to grant the subject any lasting notability. Richard3120 (talk) 14:20, 7 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.