Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Pupo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted by User:Skier Dude under criterion G7 with additional comment of "rather than belabor the AfD process, accepting G7". (non-admin closure)  " Pepper "  @ 12:52, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Jorge Pupo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Vanispamcruftisement. This Autobiography is a glorified resume advertising this person. Sourcing includes a mix of classmates.com, imdb, jorgepupo.com, wikipedia and shops. Not independent reliable sources. Other sourcing is deceptive, doing things like support part of a claim but not the part that involves him (eg "In 2003, Pupo narrated José Martí's most famous poem" is supported by a reference that says the poem is famous but nothing about Pupo narrating it) or merely verifying the existance of a company Pupo may or may not have worked with. Nothing supplies significant independent coverage of Pupo. This advert should be deleted. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:38, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete though I must take issue with the nominator's characterization "glorified resume" -- there's no glory here at all.
 * "[I]n 2002, he worked with portrait photographer Timothy Greenfield-Sanders to shoot an international, all media print ad campaign for UPS appearing as 'The Shipping Manager.'." Oh, how sad! Why do people insist on embarassing themselves like this? EEng (talk) 08:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 11:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. It's quite obvious that the editor who created the page is Pupo himself and after a search it was very obvious that Pupo does not meet the notability guidelines for WP:NACTOR or any other bio guideline. Merely narrating an audiobook or participating in a movie in some format does not give you notability regardless of whether or not Amazon lists you as narrator or not. The only halfway usable non-primary or IMDb source I see is one to audiofile that comments on his narrating and even then it is more of a trivial source at best. The ridiculous sourcing here and the exaggerated layout of the article is pretty much the best example of WP:PUFFERY that I've ever seen. I actually sort of recommend that if possible, we keep part or all of this on one of the help-type pages as an example of what puffery can look like. (Not keeping the article, just using it as an example.) Tokyogirl79 (talk) 12:06, 6 March 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79


 * Delete Does not establish notability even with our forgiving guidelines on notability for WP:ACTORS. A reference section loaded with 'references' from imdb and classmates.com doesn't quite cut it.  Web search doesn't bring up much more than these two sites.  Fails WP:GNG.  As usual tokyogirl79 is on point - this is some excellent WP:PUFFERY!  MisterRichValentine    (talk)  15:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete—Lets see... sourced to IMDb, classmates.com, Wikipedia, oh, and to a site with "resume" in the url. In other words, "per above editors".  Liv it ⇑ Eh?/What? 00:00, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.