Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joris Jarsky


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Article was improved since the start of this discussion which helped the article on meeting WP:V and does pass slightly WP:N with the improvements. JForget 21:12, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Joris Jarsky

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

DELETE cutting to the chase here this person does not appear to be noteworthy enough to receive a Wikipedia page. JBsupreme (talk) 03:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Clubmarx (talk) 06:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. As is, this article does not currently meet WP:V; however, I think the subject probably meets # 1 of WP:ENTERTAINER. He has been in many films [ and has had significant roles in a number of them including the role of Seth in [[Saw V]].  Location (talk) 18:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is currently being improved. Even as of this timecode, the unsourced one-sentence stub has already been expanded to show his stage, film, and television career... and it now has the inclusion of two nice in-depth article about him. More is in the offing, but I believe it has now been made a keeper... and one that merits further improvement. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 04:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Per improvements made to article as referenced by MichaelQSchmidt. --Milowent (talk) 20:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Four nice in-depth articles sourcing it now. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 07:14, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.