Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Francisco Gomes Monteiro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The SandDoctor Talk 20:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

José Francisco Gomes Monteiro

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Mayor of a town of 7,500 people, putting it in the final third of Portugal's municipalities by population (see List of municipalities of Portugal). Available resources for the biography are mainly from local news and even then are mostly announcements of candidacy and election results. There's an article from national radio about him opening the town hall to the public in their lunch hour which is kind of cute, a regional news story about him speaking about the cheese festival , and astonishingly an in-depth national news website made an article about his broken promise to open the swimming pool again but does this really justify an article for a politician of this level? Unknown Temptation (talk) 21:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete no indication of notability. Mccapra (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:GNG CommanderWaterford (talk) 22:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above fails WP:GNG. Hulatam (talk) 13:41, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't meet WP:NPOL and no reason they pass WP:GNG. Elliot321 (talk &#124; contribs) 17:25, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Mayors do not get an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL just because they exist — the notability test for a mayor requires some actual substance supported by a significant volume of reliable source coverage to demonstrate his political importance, and is not automatically passed by every mayor just because you single-source his existence to a directory entry in a primary source. Bearcat (talk) 16:56, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete not all mayors are notable, that is the level of inclusion we would need to have to justify having an article on this person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom  Devoke  water  18:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.