Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Freijo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 03:02, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

José Freijo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable footballer who fails WP:GNG and has never played in a fully-professional league, failing WP:NFOOTBALL. The claim he played international football for Eq. Guinea is not supported. GiantSnowman 21:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 21:51, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment Rayo Vallecano is a team playing in a professional league. --Mr. Mario (talk) 22:04, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * They weren't when he played for them. GiantSnowman 22:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yep, this one will be a GNG or bust. I'm still reviewing. Ryan Vesey 22:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Before I leave for 5 days, I'll remind everyone of WP:ROUTINE and WP:BLP1E. GiantSnowman 22:17, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. 19:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 16 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league, meaning this article fails WP:NSPORT, and what coverage there is is routine, meaning the article fails WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 10:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - as the article now stands, it fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. If we can find a source that states that he has been capped for his country, we could keep this. Mentoz86 (talk) 03:18, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the nomination.--Juristicweb (talk) 18:44, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.