Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José I. Lozano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Clear consensus here that the improvements have remedied the problems Kevin (talk) 22:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

José I. Lozano

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Completing nomination for unregistered user. Reason given on talk is: ''Fails notability - only citations are a press release and a primary source. PROD removed without improvement.'' - 2/0 (cont.) 08:26, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination - lack of significant coverage. Fails WP:BIO.  JUJUTACULAR  | TALK 11:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I vote Keep because I can provide improved references for this person. I was not finished with this article when it was tagged for proposed deletion.--ACRSM 13:17, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The arguments against this article are no longer relevant. Request review of the article by those who propose deletion.--ACRSM 16:12, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I am satisfied that there is sufficient depth of independent coverage for an article. Please note that the reference 4 is in the way of being a press release, and should be used with caution. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, consider speedy close. Anon nominated the article while still being written and failed to revisit the issue after the article was completed and the defects apparently cured. Bad behavior. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per ACRSM's improvements. CEO of a major LA newspaper would seem notable to me, for his implied ability to shape and influence public debate if nothing else. - DustFormsWords (talk) 03:27, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.