Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José L. Domingo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Bruxton (talk) 21:43, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

José L. Domingo

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE, but unlike WP:Articles for deletion/Mei-Ching Fok, an account bearing the name of the subject is the one who requested deletion, stating "". This subject easily passes WP:NPROF on multiple accounts: chief editor of multiple journals, distinguished prof, 38k cites w/ h-index of 97; I figured it better to get community input since he above and beyond passes our criteria. Curbon7 (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * For the record, I am in favor of keeping for the reasons I outline in the last sentence; this nomination is procedural as in the stead of the subject. Curbon7 (talk) 18:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Spain. Curbon7 (talk) 17:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep This fits the definition of articles to keep, he is notable and just because the author is mad doesn't mean it is a bad article. There is no apparent illegal, slanderous or other content that would not be worthy to keep Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! (talk) 17:26, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. BLPREQUESTDELETE is for borderline cases, not for non-borderline people to suppress recent negative information about themselves. (I removed the information from the article because it had inadequate sourcing for a BLP, but I strongly suspect it to be the cause of this deletion attempt.) —David Eppstein (talk) 17:27, 30 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Edit warring dramas aside, the subject is not a relatively unknown, non-public figure (WP:BLPREQUESTDELETE). MarioGom (talk) 16:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep a WP:FRINGEBLP to a degree in terms of anti-GMO sentiment, so even if the subject wants it deleted, that can't be used to scrub what they became notable for. If anything, the article seems pretty tame right now. KoA (talk) 16:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)