Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/José Luis Sánchez Rull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 05:42, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

José Luis Sánchez Rull

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable. Tagged since May. Created by SPA. Epeefleche (talk) 06:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment There is no article on this subject on Spanish Wikipedia. asnac (talk) 09:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak delete. There is a good number of notes regarding activities he's taken part in, mainly government-sponsored, for example, but they are mostly press releases with little to no modification to the original text. The reference used in the article is a copy of this note, which is a reliable source. It talks about a particular exposition, and Sánchez Rull is quoted at two points giving his opinion on the importance of drawings in culture, and here he gets a very passing mention regarding another exposition. This two articles  do talk about his work, but again surrounding a particular event. I wasn't able to find one item that simply discussed Sánchez Rull or his work, and the only results from GBooks are a couple of gallery listings. Finally, he took part with a large number of artists in a project for the bicentennial , and he is sorted under Young trajectory, which I think pretty much reflects what the other sources show — Frankie (talk) 00:34, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 13:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.