Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Isasi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 19:26, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Jose Isasi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

It's a resume. Can't find any reliable sources relating to this person. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 19:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 19:15, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is a resume. Some sources pop up regarding a tobacco lawsuit, but nothing for this individual. Oaktree b (talk) 21:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. --NoonIcarus (talk) 22:59, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:05, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:07, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:07, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:07, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:07, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:08, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is borderline G11 content created when Wikipedia's standards of review were far lower. Bensci54 (talk) 17:31, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - Could maybe be something there. It seems like there are a lot of opportunities for sourcing if investigated.KatoKungLee (talk) 03:30, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: BLP article without I RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need proper sourcing.  // Timothy :: talk  07:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.