Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Maria Panganiban Monument


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Very little here argues that the topic is non-notable. No prejudice against further discussions surrounding the best way to arrange the content, perhaps via partial merge. j⚛e deckertalk 02:46, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Jose Maria Panganiban Monument

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This has questionable notability and seems of topic (parts of the article is about the person not the statue). Could possibly be split into two articles, one about the monument and one about the person. NickGibson3900 (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Monument being considered as a National Historical Landmark having been built in the early 1900s is without a doubt notable. I would suggest removing the biography section of the figure being honored as this is already found in the article on Jose Maria Panganiban.--RioHondo (talk) 11:45, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. The monument, being more than 50 years old qualifies it for heritage status under the Philippines' heritage law. It is also the oldest known monument erected in honor of this Bicol hero and has been declared the monument to the hero by a resolution passed by Naga City council. I think this already establishes notability. There's another news article about this monument that could be added as a source to the article. But I agree that the biographic information should be merged with the biography article. —seav (talk) 16:16, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge to Jose Maria Panganiban. The main article is relatively short and can absorb the info from this article.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:52, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I think this is part of the cultural mapping project of WPPH. See Wikipedia talk:Tambayan Philippines. --RioHondo (talk) 09:46, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - perfectly fine stub; not a POV fork. Bearian (talk) 17:30, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.