Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose R. Gullas Halad Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Spartaz Humbug! 04:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Jose R. Gullas Halad Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No context, minimal content and no links to other articles Shaad lko (talk) 03:19, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep That is not enough reason for deletion. The subject is certainly notable, and well covered in independent third-part sources. See, , , , . While it certainly needs a major rewrite, it shouldn't be deleted because of that. Moray An Par (talk) 03:32, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Easily meets the WP:GNG, some cleanup remains but it's clearly moving in the right direction. Also, it is really a bad idea to nominate articles for deletion within ten minutes of their creation. Qrsdogg (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - As above, clearly meets WP:GNG. Not following WP:BEFORE and AfDing an article within 10 minutes of creation  is not always a good idea.--Oakshade (talk) 16:06, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Unsure All of the references seem to be from the same paper, I'm not familiar enough with this area to know whether these are likely to be reprinted press releases or not. Certainly more diverse sources are needed. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * They're all different articles and all but the last listed by Maray An Par are credited to reporters which indicate they are not press releases.--Oakshade (talk) 22:59, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.