Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Rosete


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Jose Rosete

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unremarkable working actor. Originally proposed for deletion, but User:Neptune's Trident (the article creator) added some low quality references and removed the tag. This is connected to a long running promtional effort on behalf of J. C. Macek III, who produced a film in which Jose Rosete appears. World&#39;s Lamest Critic (talk) 04:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC) World&#39;s Lamest Critic (talk) 04:28, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 09:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  15:59, 23 July 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Delete; references are a joke Pariah24 (talk) 06:27, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete, those really are some terrible references. None of them are actually about the article subject; for example the New York Times link is just a (bot-generated?) filmography with no reviews or profile. It may look well-referenced at a glance but this is effectively an unsourced BLP.  A  Train talk 13:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep, full disclosure, I created this article, and yes, the references could be better, but looking at it now I think it could still be improved, I originally thought maybe delete but changing my vote to keep for what it is worth. Neptune&#39;s Trident (talk) 23:25, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , if you can dredge up some reasonable sources before the end of the week, I'll happily change my position.  A  Train talk 14:43, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. These sources do not establish notability. They mention the subject but none are actually about the subject. agt x  19:16, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete IDC about the quality of the refs, I checked for GNG. So far I don't believe he passes, but I am willing to wait till the end of the week to see if author can improve.L3X1 (distænt write)   )evidence(  00:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.