Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Thomas Performing Arts Centre (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 01:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Jose Thomas Performing Arts Centre
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non Notable Performing Arts Center Uncletomwood (talk) 17:41, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm not going to lie, I didn't look at this article (which I bet needs work!) nor did I do my own search for sources. But this has survived two previous AFDs, both with their nomination withdrawn after reliable sources were presented amidst unanimous keep !votes. Now, consensus can change, but given the deletion history of this article, it's going to take a somewhat more verbose nomination for me to consider it. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 18:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 *  Keep Previous deletion debates have been unanimous in favor of keeping. The article has several good references. The New Indian Express published an article early this year about the theatre and its financial problems. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  21:28, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:38, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: There are some sources here which suggests GNG for this topic. This one needs improvement not deletion (added it to my to-do list). Anup   [Talk]  11:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Can you please take a look at improved article and sources listed there-in? I believe notability-concern raised in nomination has been addressed; if so, you can withdraw and close this afd. Thank you. Anup   [Talk]  18:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per others, seems to be a sizable and notable venue. Citobun (talk) 13:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.