Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jose Vides


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ks0stm (T•C•G•E) 07:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Jose Vides

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

He has not played a professional senior game at club or international level. Article fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Also fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 13:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 13:48, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete unnotable player in a minor national team. SalHamton (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Just for future reference. It does not matter how minor his national team is, if he played for bloody Bhutan then make it. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 20:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:07, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 19:07, 28 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or for his national team, nor has he received significant coverage. As such, the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:24, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails NFOOTY and GNG. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 20:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:39, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - article is about a footballer that hasn't played in a fully pro league or represented his country at senior level, which means that the article fails WP:NFOOTY. Also fails WP:GNG due to lack of coverage in reliable sources. Mentoz86 (talk) 15:48, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.