Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josef Berger (scientist)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (withdrawn). (non-admin closure) – DarkGlow • 22:12, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Josef Berger (scientist)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not appear to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC/WP:NAUTHOR. Been in CAT:NN for almost 12 years, so let's resolve this. – DarkGlow • 19:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 19:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 19:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. – DarkGlow • 19:33, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. Google scholar shows five publications with over 100 citations each, making a weak case for WP:PROF, and as editor-in-chief of a bluelinked journal he has a stronger case for #C8. The superficial nomination statement (not even addressing the editorship although it is one of the explicit criteria in WP:PROF, and yet claiming to have evaluated the subject as not passing WP:PROF) creates the appearance that the nominator is just blindly nominating articles with old notability tags rather than making an effort to resolve them more directly. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I used Google as my basis for the nomination; forgive me for not knowing Google Scholar is the more appropriate search tool for deeming notability for academics. I don't "blindly" nominate for AfD. – DarkGlow • 20:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notability is clear. The nominator ought to withdraw this AfD and reconsider their other prods and AfDs. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 21:17, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.