Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph: A Victorian Fairy Tale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 22:15, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Joseph: A Victorian Fairy Tale

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Book is a nonnotable self-published (through Lulu.com vanity press) title that clearly does not meet the book notability guidelines. DreamGuy 21:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 22:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No secondary sources to establish notability. Jay32183 20:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 03:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. Googling turns up no evidence of reviews or other third-party coverage. Deor 12:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete the article even comes right out and says it's published by a vanity publisher. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.