Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Allegro


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Allegro

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This was redlinked in the discussion logs, so I'm fixing the nomination for User:Rogermx, and left a note on his talk page to come and provide his rationale for deletion. I would hazard a guess that it's because the subject of this article is an unnotable minor criminal. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 10:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Dylan, thank you for fixing the nomination for me - this is my first one. I have found no hits on Google for the subject, there is only one reference source provided, and the content indicates that the subject is indeed a minor criminal who is neither famous or notorious. I suggest we delete the article. Thank you. Rogermx (talk) 18:45, 31 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The article cites one source. It doesn't give the page number.  I've looked through the book as best I can and I cannot find where it actually supports all of this content.  It talks about "the guys", rather than this particular individual specifically.  I cannot find any other sources documenting this person's life and works at all.  As a misrepresentation of the source given, with no other sources apparently existing, this is unverifiable. Delete. Uncle G (talk) 23:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 02:28, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete no references to support any information in the article. --Vic49 22:10, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.