Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Burke (lawyer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The SandDoctor Talk 00:25, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Joseph Burke (lawyer)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

lawyer, with nothing notable about them, except one reference to  participation in a peripheral matter of a major case, No other 3rd part Reliable sources for notability. I tried to draftify, but was reverted by the contibutor.  DGG ( talk ) 16:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable not yet elected candidate for public office.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep has been published about more than twice in widely distrubted newspapers in Australia.TruthInfects (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable lawyer doing his job; no coverage other than that routinely expected of a lawyer representing a party whose case is in the news. That news coverage might suggest that the cases themselves are notable, but that possible notability is not contagious to the attorney. WP:NOTINHERITED. TJRC (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Also 4th reference is usless as article is hidden behind paywall. Teraplane (talk) 21:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.