Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph C. Kush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Joseph C. Kush

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Notability MicrobiologyMarcus(petri dish&#8226;cultures) 19:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 18:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: It would help things if the nominator offered a fuller deletion rationale that demonstrated they had done a BEFORE rather than simply typing one word that doesn't distinguish what specific problems exist with this article and its sources. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MicrobiologyMarcus(petri dish&#8226;cultures) 19:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment leaning Keep. There are three highly or moderately highly cited papers in GS with a relatively slow drop off (360,214,121,94,78) and GS is estimating an h-index of 21; I don't know where that falls for this field. His CV is listing (co-)edited books Technology implementation and teacher education: Reflective models (Information Science Publishing; 2010) and Intelligence Quotient: testing, Role of genetics and the environment and social outcomes (Nova Science Publishers; 2013), the latter as sole editor, although we have tended to undervalue editor contributions. Espresso Addict (talk) 02:43, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.