Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Capecci


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. v/r - TP 17:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Joseph Capecci

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Apparently exists (USPTO lists two of the claimed patents, see note on Talk page), but I was unable to find reliable, secondary sources which clearly refer to this inventor/architect/dean/board director and which provide in-depth coverage of him. There are individuals with the same name who don't appear to be this fellow, it's possible I've missed reliable sources in the process, additional sources welcomed as always. joe deckertalk to me 21:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 23:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject of this unsourced BLP. Based on the detailed account of this person's life appears to be an WP:Autobiography. J04n(talk page) 01:16, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete can't find any significant coverage. and a few similar documents confirm he was Dean of Administration at John Jay College but don't say anything else. Hut 8.5 11:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per comments above. --Kumioko (talk) 16:30, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 3 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not enough. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete doesn't seem to establish notability and not a single third party sourceCurb Chain (talk) 16:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.