Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Charette


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  06:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Joseph Charette

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Commendable, but hardly worth an article. No independent sources. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:41, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:42, 29 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Commendable. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:51, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --hroest 16:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No claim of notability. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  04:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks SIGCOV in multiple RS to meet WP:GNG. Mztourist (talk) 06:35, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Medal of Bravery might be a valid notability claim if the article had any actual reliable source coverage about Charette in the media, but it isn't "inherently" notable enough to guarantee him inclusion just because it's technically verified by his own regiment's self-published content on its own website. Notability is not measured by the things the article says, it's measured by the amount of media coverage the subject did or didn't get about the things it says. Bearcat (talk) 15:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.