Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Curtatone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) John from Idegon (talk) 21:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Joseph Curtatone

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NPOL John from Idegon (talk) 23:51, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as one would expect from a nine-term mayor of a city in a major urban area, there have been numerous independent sources which have covered the subject in detail. As such, it easily passes WP:GNG. For example, Curatone is the subject of an entire book published in 2019. Major news outlets, both in the Boston region and nationwide have covered Curtatone in detail as well. These include ABC News and the Washington Post, and Bloomberg. I hope the nominator will follow WP:BEFORE nominating next time.--TM 23:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:09, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:10, 9 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep: Contrary to the nomination, Nambia's sources indicate that Curtatone is the subject of significant national coverage. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:46, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Notable per links listed above. Grk1011 (talk) 16:55, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn - the Wapo source above satisfies WP:NPOL. The other sources do not. John from Idegon (talk) 17:53, 9 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep, A long term mayor with significant coverage. Alex-h (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.