Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Eastwood Anaba


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SOFTDELETE due to minimal participation even after being relisted twice. Joyous! | Talk 00:35, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Joseph Eastwood Anaba

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough coverage in independent, reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and WP:BIO. The sources are not independent or are things like Goodreads and Soundcloud. From the claims it is possible there is some local coverage but I can not find a single independent reliable source. All BLPs require a reliable source but since there are claimed "sources" this can not be BLPPRODed. J bh Talk  20:02, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  20:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  20:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions.  J bh  Talk  20:03, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I agree with the nom about the lack of adequate sourcing prior to the article being nominated. I reviewed the sources that have been added since, and they haven't gotten much better.  Some are primary sources affiliated with the subject and some are blog/listicle-type articles that don't appear reliable.  This one appears to be the only legit news source, and that isn't enough to verify and entire BLP. --Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 16:49, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.