Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Huber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. W.marsh 17:09, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Joseph Huber

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete: non-notable; PRODded previously but tag rv with no improvement. Dustbowldiaspora 13:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete 800 google hits associated with the university. Based on the top 10, he looks like just another professor; see WP:PROF. Yechiel Man  14:19, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Another 469 hits for his book GG-Szenario. Which is still not enough to impress, but it suggests that your count of his ghits was unnecessarily restrictive. —David Eppstein 18:35, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing teh WP:PROF.  tomasz.  15:24, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions.   -- Pharamond 16:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. There are a couple of significant references to him in German. Here a FAZ article about his "GG-Szenario" book, here an interview on Deutschlandradio. The article however is poorly written, apparently confusing Numismatics with Monetary Policy. Stammer 05:24, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per the references found by Stammer. —David Eppstein 17:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The English language papers are in a miscellany of sources, only a few in major journals. The main source of notability would be from the book. DGG' 04:20, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, decent Google scholar results. John Vandenberg 01:12, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, contributions undocumented, probably should have been marked for improvement before afd, but there is so little here. if the author does not care enough to write a first draft.... --Buridan 09:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * It was probably written in response to it being a redlink on three articles. John Vandenberg 10:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.