Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Imre (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:49, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Joseph Imre
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. All sources I could find were academic publications with the subject as the author or automatically generated profiles that do not satisfy WP:SIGCOV. See Articles for deletion/Joseph Imre, although it's quite old. From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page) 00:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page)  00:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  From AnUnnamedUser (open talk page)  00:30, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. I can't find sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:21, 10 November 2019 (UTC).
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:55, 10 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can't find the book reviews that would allow him to pass WP:AUTHOR and we have no evidence of any other kind of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:37, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have much, much better reliable source coverage than this even attempts to show. People are not inherently notable just for owning cooking schools, or for being on the board of directors of the BIA in the small town where their cooking school is located, and historians don't get an automatic inclusion freebie just because their writing exists either — no matter what occupation you're trying to put out as his notability claim, he still has to be the subject of media coverage about his work in that role to clear the notability bar. As well, the old AFD discussion isn't actually as irrelevant here as it may seem at first — this version was literally recreated just slightly more than one year after the original discussion's closure, by the same WP:SPA who had created it the first time, but even though it wasn't even the slightest improvement on the old version it somehow slid under the radar until now instead of being immediately speedied on sight as a recreation of deleted content the way it should have been. Salt this while we're at it, because it has literally all the classic hallmarks of being self-promotion by a person who's very likely to just try again a third time once he notices that it's gone. Bearcat (talk) 20:06, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:PROF, and WP:42. Just to be sure, I looked and found nothing on JSTOR, nor Google News. Improving health equity for First Nations, Inuit and Metis people: Ontario's Aboriginal cancer strategy II has been cited exactly 10 times. Many people teach cooking. This is almost certainly an autobiography. I remind our Canadian friends that our president was just fined USD $2,000,000 for self-dealing with a charity like ours, eh? Bearian (talk) 19:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.