Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph M Remy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Joseph M Remy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable violinist. Only thing I can find on "Joseph Remy" or "Joseph Ma" that remotely matches the person described in this article is a passing mention here, but that's hardly enough to establish notability. Very impressive if the article is true, but no RS coverage turned up. KuyaBriBri Talk 14:37, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Article subject is not sufficiently notable for Wikipedia.THD3 (talk) 16:09, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:N T-95 (talk) 17:42, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 03:55, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm inclined to think this is a hoax, given the fact that someone who has apparently had such a successful career so far does not seem to be mentioned anywhere. Willing to change my mind if definitive proof of this person's existence can be provided.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 04:22, 11 April 2009 (UTC).
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.  —PC78 (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - why is there not an AfD tag on the article in question? Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 05:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: no independent 3rd party coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 01:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, The user that created this article, Got mad at us for putting a AfD tag on the article and started to vandalize. Seen Here and Here Hmmm --  Michael  (Talk) 17:55, 13 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.