Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Myers (ice hockey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 23:39, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Joseph Myers (ice hockey)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 23:58, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 18:56, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, unless I'm missing something obvious here. He's played numerous games at the top professional league in the UK, so surely meets WP:NHOCKEY criteria. Sionk (talk) 21:05, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:NHOCKEY/LA considers the EIHL a "Lower-level leagues" which means that in order to pass NHOCKEY he would have to have "Achieved preeminent honors" which he has not. Joeykai (talk) 21:21, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Surely if he's played that many games as a goaltender he meets the criteria all the same. Sionk (talk) 21:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
 * No, he doesn't. Have you read the criteria? Joeykai (talk) 18:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was a rhetorical question. "Played at least 200 games (90 games for a goaltender)... in top-level minor leagues or second tier national leagues" Sionk (talk) 18:56, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I already addressed this, but look at WP:NHOCKEY/LA. The EIHL is not a top-level minor league, it is a lower-lever minor league, which means the only way he can pass NHOCKEY with his EIHL career is if he passed criteria #4 of NHOCKEY which is "achieved preeminent honors" and he has not done this. Joeykai (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete The only thing that he can be assessed on as an ice hockey player is on criterion #4 and he falls well short of the requirements. The current conversation about his eligibility under criterion #3 is moot as he has never played in a league of that caliber at this point in time. Deadman137 (talk) 20:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant coverage to meet WP:GNG and fails to meet WP:NHOCKEY. Mdtemp (talk) 17:28, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject of the article fails WP:NHOCKEY and the only source is not an independent one. — Omni Flames  ( talk   contribs ) 05:44, 6 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.