Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Pisenti


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 08:15, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Joseph Pisenti

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotional autobiographical article on an individual who lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of them. All sources used in the article are unreliable and a before search doesn’t turn up anything substantial ether. This is a blatant WP:GNG fail. Celestina007 (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 00:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi, I'm still working on this article and I only published it so other editors can add too. I have taken the precaution of saving the code though. There are many sources to this and I will add them soon. So please don't delete it.

RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 01:49, 4 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Also note that I am not promoting anything. I'm just inspired by Pisenti's videos and tried to make a page similar to Sam Denby. I know my username says RealLifeLore in it but it clearly has "fan" in it.

RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 07:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Mccapra (talk) 07:34, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

But Once I find more reliable sources, can I redo the article?

RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 22:13, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete We need to forcefully apply out anti-autobiography policies.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete To answer your question, if the article is deleted and you can provide further evidence of notability you may absolutely recreate the article. It will most likely have to withstand another AfD so make sure to include strong reliable sources. DO NOT be discouraged by the haters here on this platform. Some have nothing better to do with their time than sit on Wikipedia trashing the hard work of others just because they don't like it. Wikipedia is not here as their personal encyclopedia containing only what they deem as important. In regards to the current article, I agree with the nominator, who put a lot of effort into a search, that the subject does not, yet, meet notability criteria for inclusion. I say delete as per WP:GNG & WP:TOOSOON. To fan80, keeping working and digging for sources and please continue editing and creating here. -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 21:24, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries, I agree with Celestina007 and your suggestion. Thanks for your kind message. I won't be discouraged and I'll keep making new articles and contribute for a long time. RealLifeLorefan80 (talk) 21:42, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:V, zero WP:RS for a WP:BLP, and WP:NOTRESUME. In 2008, we could WP:AGF, but in 2021, this is a thumb in the eye. We literally can't even verify this person exists. I see the consensus that YouTubers are rarely notable, much as my boyfriend. Bearian (talk) 01:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
 * That's a lie, he's written a book and keep your boyfriend out of this. Though I am happy for it to be deleted. AussieCoinCollector (talk) 04:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.