Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh's Law


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:42, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Josh's Law

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of notability. The one citation provided is to a regional newspaper that only uses the phrase once, in passing. —Ute in DC (talk) 02:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, no notability of this actually being a phrase in common use. Delusion23 (talk) 11:25, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No significant or notable coverage in many mainstream media, only one citation. -- Takamaxa ( Talk ) 13:34, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable quote from a non notable person. MLA (talk) 21:37, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Encyclopedias are not made up of every phrase someone is quoted as saying in a local newspaper. Fails notability. Edison (talk) 21:40, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. FieldMarine (talk) 00:41, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like a non notable person attempting to start a notable quote via social marketing/media. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.190.98.53 (talk) 17:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.