Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Adjutant


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems like notability concerns win out here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Josh Adjutant

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable politician. Unelected candidate for state house seat. No reliable sources. (WP:BLPPROD applies). WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:56, 28 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and WP:GNG. Comatmebro  User talk:Comatmebro 00:27, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per both of the above. We almost always delete such articles (with the clear exception of US Senate and Presidential candidates). Since the New Hampshire House of Representatives has 400 members, this candidate is very much run of the mill. Bearian (talk) 15:40, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. As always, an unelected candidate for a state legislature does not get a Wikipedia article just for being a candidate — if you cannot show and source credible evidence that he was already notable enough for an article for some other reason independent of his candidacy, then he does not become notable enough for an article until he wins the election. For added bonus, this is referenced only to his own primary source content about himself, and cites no reliable source coverage at all — and even an actual officeholder doesn't get to rest on that kind of sourcing. No prejudice against recreation if he wins his seat next month, but nothing here entitles him to an article today. Bearcat (talk) 15:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unelected politician. That category of biographies has a higher-than-average bar for inclusion, primarily because they are such magnets for tendentious and promotional editing. Carrite (talk) 17:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.