Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Faga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 01:56, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Josh Faga

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. PROD contested by author without any reason. – Michael (talk) 21:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Michael (talk) 21:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, it's true, the three clubs Faga has played for are not in fully professional leagues, according to WikiProject_Football/Fully_professional_leagues. Sionk (talk) 21:41, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Um, that's not necessarily true. If you look at WP:FPL again, you can see that USL Pro is a fully pro league, which Rochester Rhinos are playing in.  But just being on a team doesn't count (as we all know).  He has to feature in a fully pro league match, a competitive cup match that features two fully pro teams or appear in a full international match. – Michael (talk) 22:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:55, 25 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage in reliable sources, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:46, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 17:52, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.