Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Fusitua


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 19:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Josh Fusitua

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a New Zealand rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. JTtheOG (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union,  and New Zealand. JTtheOG (talk) 23:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep Think there's just about enough when sourcing snippets are combined, such as this, this, this among others. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
 * For future reference, a database profile and two primary sources do not come close to meeting GNG. JTtheOG (talk) 18:59, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Delete as per JTtheOG, can't see any thorough coverage of this person. David Palmer aka cloventt (talk) 02:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: It would be helpful to get a review of sources establishing GNG. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:57, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep This is a young player at the beginning of his career and he is playing regularly for the now. There are already more sources available about this player than used for this stub and it is foreseeable that there will be more written about him in the future. Ruggalicious (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Which sources did you find? JTtheOG (talk) 03:29, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.