Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Johnson (infielder)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:11, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Josh Johnson (infielder)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable minor leaguer who hasn't played past Single-A, definetely doesn't clear the WP:ATHLETE guideline. Giants27 T/  C  00:18, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of coverage that would make him notable under the general guidelines. Nyttend (talk) 00:21, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect per JJL's point: nothing wrong with mentioning him and having a redirect. Nyttend (talk) 00:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions.  — Giants27  T/  C  00:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- Giants27  T/  C  00:23, 9 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete non notable player--Yankees10 00:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Northwest Arkansas Naturals; fails WP:ATHLETE but mentioned there and rds are cheap. JJL (talk) 00:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. This is a frustrating one, because I could well be missing RS out there showing notability. Any signal is completely swamped by the Marlins pitcher of the same name.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  15:58, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn baseball player. That and "redirects are cheap" is a silly argument. Wizardman  19:00, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment it's plausible that someone might want to search for him, and if he does ever make it to the majors this preserves the biographical data already there. JJL (talk) 19:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete nothing significant about this player that warrants a Wiki page; minor league numbers are not great and a callup does not seem eminent. Mandermagic (talk) 02:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Statistics or brief mentions in articles about minor league teams do not constitute "significant coverage in reliable sources," as required by WP:N. BRMo (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to Kansas City Royals minor league players. Spanneraol (talk) 15:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.