Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Justice

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. --AndyL 16:33, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Josh Justice
Doesn't seem notable. See also Votes for deletion/Innovative Strategic Solutions. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 13:04, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not yet notable enough, he could be just a "flash in the pan." However, having read some background (and there really isn't that much out there), he sounds like the type that we will be adding in the not too distant future, probably as a Canadian MP just for starters. HyperZonktalk 17:27, Mar 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Megan1967 23:07, 4 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Have made some changes to the article; several redlinks resulted from misspellings or bad wording of articles that do exist on Wikipedia. That said, I'm neutral about this one at the moment, though I reserve the right to actually cast a vote once I've had time to think about it. Bearcat 07:45, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC) (Update: officially voting to delete, same reasoning as AndyL below.) Bearcat 16:31, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC) 
 * Delete Minor party hack. Non-notable. Having articles on candidates is one thing but if we open the floodgate to campaign managers at the constituency level there'll be no end to it. AndyL 20:34, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Spinboy 02:35, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. He has worked with/for some notable people, but this does not make him notable.  -- James Teterenko (talk) 02:41, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. I have to go along with delete on this, although I usually vote to keep. In this case, it sounds like a vanity article and largely unverifiable. Actually, I think it's more that no-one will care enough to verify it. Kevintoronto 22:57, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Borderline delete - no verification supplied, I'm entirely unconvinced anyone will be interested - David Gerard 12:05, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.