Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Levenson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 01:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Josh Levenson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, quick Google search yields no results from independent sources regarding the subject. lovkal (talk) 20:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Article has a prior discussion that resulted in speedy delete (instead of just delete, strangely). Per Nom. I agree. Reb1981 (talk) 20:48, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   21:12, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment The one on page self-sourced. That alone does not prove notability. You would need a valid secondary independant source, too. The ones listed do not have any info to proved who the person is. Reb1981 (talk) 21:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom; there is no way I can determine if the author at The Next Web is the person referred to in this article, which is proof of the lack of notability. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - no significant coverage in secondary sources. His Facebook, Twitter, and other accounts are primary sources and as such can not be used to indicate notability. It is relevant that the article has been speedy deleted before, for lack of credible claims of significance. --bonadea contributions talk 21:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - no secondary sources references, as above.Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.