Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh McEachran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 14:28, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Josh McEachran

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Schoolboy footballer. Yet to play a professional game so fails WP:ATHLETE noq (talk) 07:17, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks pretty close to a CSD A7 to me -- Boing!   said Zebedee  12:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Promising" means nothing. Do something first. &mdash; Timneu22 · talk 15:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * He plays for the Chelsea academy team, Schoolboy level is U-16 and below. He did 'do something' last night and won the FA Youth Cup with Chelsea. Likely to be playing for Chelsea reserves next season. Bobbymozza (talk) 07:48 5 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete "Ain't done it yet" = non-notable.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:56, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 06:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG; recreate if & when he become notable in the future. GiantSnowman 06:37, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - playing for the academy team is not enough, and "likely to be playing for the reserves next season" is crystal balling and still won't be enough anyway. Recreate should he play professionally, which should happen eventually if the rather grandiose statement that he'll turn out to be as good as Messi (no pressure there, then......) is actually true...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:50, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.