Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Negrin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 05:37, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Josh Negrin

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This article was recently deleted under CSD A7 but I talked the deleting admin into restoring it because I felt there was a weak assertion of significance. However, the subject may not be notable so let's see what the community says. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, Ron, you've stumped me. As far as I can see the assertion of significance seems to be that he was on the production team for Kevin Pollock's web chat webtv show, and the show (not Negrin personally) won one of the 35 webtv show awards made in 2010 by a website called streamys.com. What am I missing? Incidentally, while I was researching I found and watched this 2-minute video clip by Negrin (definitely him--you can see him, he's in it), and I thought it showed a bit of talent.  With any luck, one day there'll be a proper biography in this space.  But I don't see that he's over the bar for notability now.— S Marshall  T/C 01:15, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes the assertion of IoS on this is very marginal. It's one I probably wouldn't have tagged on my own but wouldn't contest if tagged. However, the deleting admin asked me for my opinion and I gave it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment I have to say that apart from a Steamy (and is that even notable) there seems to be no evidance of notability and none of coverage. I would waite to see if any of those who work on this page can come up with any sources if not then this should be deletedSlatersteven (talk) 14:37, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.