Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Owens (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Josh Owens
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Prod removed. Unspectacular athlete. Curb Chain (talk) 02:29, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:GNG. Multiple sources of signficant coverage from reliable independent sources cited in article.—Bagumba (talk) 03:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 04:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep - This person has received ongoing significant coverage in reliable sources, thus the subject passes WP:BASIC for a Wikipedia article. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:05, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No, I don't see anything unique nor has any sources been provided to show that he his.Curb Chain (talk) 22:58, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Curb: Please read the guidelines that supporters are citing. There is no guideline that says that "unspectacular" people need to be deleted, nor that they need to "unique".  Multiple reliable, indepedent sources devoting full articles to people are treated as an indication of notability in Wikipedia. Basketball players do not need to be Michael Jordan to be worthy of an article.23:38, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Hampshire-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 17:01, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.