Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Aston


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Joshua Aston

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a heavily WP:COI and possibly WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY article. Subject likely fails WP:ACADEMIC. Subject is an Assistant Professor, which is not tenured, only tenure track, so no guarantee the subject ever obtains academic tenure. For all the stuff listed in the article, nothing that sets him apart or distinguishes him from the hundreds of others seeking academic tenure around the world. IF/when this guy makes tenure and does something to distinguish himself pursuant to WP:ACADEMIC, then will be the time for this article. For now. delete. Safiel (talk) 01:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  05:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination; none of the content seems to support significant notability at this time. — swpb T 14:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Not notable based on profession alone.  //nepaxt  18:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as still questionable for the applicable notability and none of the current article suggests convincingly keep. SwisterTwister   talk  22:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.