Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Brennan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Salvatore Giunta. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:56, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

Joshua Brennan

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Though I hate doing this, I have to argue that there is insufficient notability. Brennan fails WP:MILPEOPLE and WP:NOTMEMORIAL; even I have to admit that a Bronze Star isn't enough and his death is not particularly remarkable in the terms of WP:GNG. Since his noteriety is almost dependant on Salvatore Giunta‎'s attempt to save his life, I would consider a redirect to that article.  bahamut0013  words deeds 14:22, 16 November 2010 (UTC) See also WP:BAHAD.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  — bahamut0013  words deeds  14:39, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — bahamut0013  words deeds  14:39, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  — bahamut0013  words deeds  14:39, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

I am generally opposed to deletion but in this case almost all the notable material can be found elsewhere on Wikipedia, in particular in the Sal Giunta article. I would recommend merge but merge has essentially already been done such that I recommend delete.--Brian Dell (talk) 16:49, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect: I agree with the nominator's rationale, this subject does not meet WP:MILPEOPLE or the WP:GNG. A redirect seems an appropriate compromise as it seems like it might be a valid search term. AustralianRupert (talk) 19:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, the nomination covers it. A redirect would be fine if the consensus is that it is a valid search term. pablo 20:54, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (weak redirect) - Notability bc of Giunta. smooth0707  (talk) 01:39, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect: Notable because of Giunta= not good enough. Deleting would miss a minor detail, so redirect instead. Jsayre64   (talk)  04:34, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nominator. Anotherclown (talk) 10:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete (weak redirect) - per nominator. Mlpearc   powwow  14:54, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.