Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Daniel-Adrian Spencer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:30, 3 May 2018 (UTC)

Joshua Daniel-Adrian Spencer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Controversial notability, partially an autobiography. Xx236 (talk) 11:42, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing to suggest he's notable. The article makes no claim of notability other than his unremarkable political activities (he's never achieved elected office)  and Google searches find nothing significant at all. Neiltonks (talk) 12:31, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 12:46, 25 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. People do not get Wikipedia articles just for standing as candidates in elections they didn't win, but nothing else here is a strong claim of notability for any other reason. Literally the only source here that's about him is a self-published WP:AUTOBIO on a user-generated platform for candidates' own campaign biographies, which is not a reliable or notability-assisting source — other than that, every single reference here is either a raw table of the election results themselves, or cursory verification of tangential facts in sources that fail to even mention Spencer's name at all in conjunction with them. This is not the kind of sourcing it takes to make a person notable just because "media coverage exists", if nothing they're supporting actually passes any of our subject-specific inclusion criteria. Bearcat (talk) 16:12, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per . Even were this not an autobiography, it clearly doesn't meet notability standards. 142.161.81.20 (talk) 23:02, 2 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.