Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua G. Berman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:43, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Joshua G. Berman

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Article has been around since 8 Feb 2006 & still has failed to established notability. The two references are to blogs. 「ɠu¹ɖяy」 ¤ • ¢ 04:22, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Subject fails to meet WP:AUTHOR. Subject is not regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. Subject is not known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. Subject has not created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. Subject's work has not (a) become a significant monument, nor (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, nor (c) has won significant critical attention, nor (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums. Cindamuse (talk) 13:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete He sounds like someone whose books I would enjoy, but I can find no evidence that his three books and one blog have attracted the kind of coverage required by WP:AUTHOR. His homepage claims one award, the "Lowell Thomas Travel Writing Bronze Award in category for Best Guidebook", but I doubt if that is enough to make him notable. --MelanieN (talk) 15:21, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.