Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Holmes (model)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

Joshua Holmes (model)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual. WP:BEFORE searching indicates no coverage of him as either a model or a runner, and the present sourcing reflects that, being composed only of blogs and Cosmo. The coverage he does have elsewhere is only passing references, with none having the depth or persistence required to pass WP:ANYBIO. (Note when searching- there's a few other unrelated individuals of the same name, especially a rather lively Minister). &mdash; O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  16:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)  &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  16:33, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep Half fast compliance with WP:Before. I already added a newspaper article you missed about his running. His website presence probably worth writing about.  If somebody has access to Newspapers.com, it should be productive. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 17:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep; that local newspaper was seen. Part of the lack of depth and persistence I mentioned; same goes for WP:PRIMARY. I note he never seems to have won a marathon, or a medal. Thanks, though! &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  17:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * He is a frequent writer on the subject of Marathons and Ultramarathons. If you google Joshua Holmes Marathon there are lots of results. Inputting Joshua Holmes model, not so much. Likewise with Highbeam  If you ask the wrong question you get the wrong answer.  GIGO.  7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 18:01, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Before attempting to understand one's answers, one should understand the questions one asks first. Accordingly, those results are:, , . Almost no coverage in reliable sources, with very few even being about him, unfortunately. &mdash;  O Fortuna   semper crescis, aut decrescis  18:10, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. clpo13(talk) 19:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU  (T/C) 20:25, 25 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:OUTCOMES: we almost always delete male model articles. Bearian (talk) 13:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * whilst we can verify the subject is alive, unless he's a real life George Kaplan, we do not have significant breadth or depth or significance of coverage to show subject meets WP:GNG delete.Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Routine stuff, nothing worthy of an encyclopaedia article. Exemplo347 (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.