Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Keijsers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:15, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Joshua Keijsers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article asserts descent and eligibility for nobility. This is not properly sourced (though there are two citations to non-reliable sources), and even if true eligibility for a noble title is not a shoe in for notability. Searching for sources brings up little on this individual, though a peoplepill.com profile lists a birth year of 2006 and relatives.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 10:11, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete No sign that he meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG. Pichpich (talk) 21:24, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:BASIC or WP:GNG, zero sources found, appears to be a WP:AUTO. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly fails all notability guidelines for inclusion. Jmertel23 (talk) 21:28, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Unable to verify by any credible independent sources.  Appears to be an autobiography.  BostonMensa (talk) 02:49, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Lack of independent sources is not a valid reason for speedy deletion, althogyh it is valid grounds for deletion after discussion. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:57, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn’t mean speedy as in the wiki option of speedy. I meant speedy the same way I’ve seen other comments in discussions like this.  There is no reason to belabor this discussion and keep it going for two, three weeks.  It appears to be an autobiography but even it isn’t, the information can’t be verified and it makes me wonder if it is made up by the original editor.  Therefore, as long as other editors continue to agree it should be deleted, whatever their reasons, the deletion should not be delayed. BostonMensa (talk) 15:20, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: no credible assertion of notability. BLP unsourced too. Pam  D  07:16, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * An A7 which you tagged this, requires not lack of assertion of notability, but lack of assertion of significance which is a rather lower standard. See WP:CCS. I declined the A7, because a reasonable percentage of those with such titles of nobility prove notable in the end, so that IMO nake them claims of significance. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:01, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
 * That is why I didn't A7 it to begin with. It also wasn't eligible for WP:BLPPROD (which I considered) as the initial version has two references, all be it malformed and bogus references, which technically precluded a BLPPROD. G11 would be a stretch, and a G3 as a blatant hoax is not obvious (heck, it might all be true! Just insignificant and not notable). -- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 04:16, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I deleted those so called references. Comments that simply say “according to (fill in name here)” don’t even come close to being references.  If the editor even said they spoke with John or Jane Doe on this day and time and in this context, I probably would have left it in but according to so and so can mean anything and yet nothing at the same time.  BostonMensa (talk) 15:26, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Although I declined the A7, I see nothing that establishes notability in the article at present, and a search of google, google books, news, and newspapers revealed nothing that even seemed to hint at notability. This view is subject to change if additional sources are presented. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:12, 23 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. This page was created by Joshua Keijsers (Joshuait). Other contributions from this editor should also be evaluated for COI and self-promotion. JoelleJay (talk) 22:18, 23 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.