Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Meyer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  So Why  07:27, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Joshua Meyer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of works in the permanent collection of major museums, and exhibition catalogs & local newspapers are inadequate sources for critical discussion.  DGG ( talk ) 20:20, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep CV on artist’s website lists extensive exhibition history including several museums and University galleries, as well as recognition for several major awards. Boston Globe and San Francisco Chronicle are major papers with important art critics. The painting in the entry is listed as part of a public collection. This all seems at least on a par with many artists included.Mze2421 (talk) 13:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  00:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep and improve. There are some issues with tone in the article, but those can be fixed with further editing. I'm seeing enough sources that the subject appears to pass WP:GNG—or at least enough that the nominator has failed to make the case that the subject fails GNG. Article is best served at this point by further work, not deletion. —C.Fred (talk) 13:50, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.