Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Todd-Cothran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to List of Left Behind characters. The Bushranger One ping only 00:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Joshua Todd-Cothran

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Minor fictional character that fails WP:GNG. Character has not received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The article only covers things from an in-universe perspective, and is simply a plot summary of part of a book. No real world notability is asserted. The article also has no references and has been tagged as such for nearly five years – since January 2009. It was also PRODded then, but the PROD was removed for the reason "notable character". Neither the challenger nor anyone else has provided any evidence of notability since. (In fact, the only improvement the article's seen since the 2009 PROD is the addition of a stub tag.) Egsan Bacon (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Merge/redirect to List of Left Behind characters. In fact, most of the "main article" characters in that List article should be merged/redirected like this one. Probably could be done without AfD since the articles are so old and unattended, but if someone complains it could be done with a multi-article AfD. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 17:54, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.