Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Travagli


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Joshua Travagli

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Concern was Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. PROD was contested on the grounds that he is signed to a fully-pro-league club. This does not confer notability since he has yet to make his debut. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  04:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  04:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  04:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  04:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. I deprodded this in error since an earlier version of the article claimed that he had played 25 games in a fully professional league.Since this claim was not correct and is no longer in the article, and there are no other claims of notability I agree the subject fails GNG. Meters (talk) 04:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. The article's statement "Travagli has yet to make his debut for the Strikers" seems key here. Looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 08:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment pinging for input, since he originally tagged article for deletion under CSD A7. └ UkPaolo/talk┐ 08:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 11:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey, I am new to this whole thing, I defer to literally anyone else on this. I am just learning how Wikipedia works! I am pajamas (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or Userfy Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY, but might pass it soon. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 09:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Has not played in a WP:FPL nor in senior international football, thus failing WP:NFOOTY. Has not garnered significant independent coverage to meet WP:GNG. This is a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. — Jkudlick t c s 14:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.