Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josif Holec


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 17:21, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Josif Holec

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:BASIC or WP:ANYBIO. Sources in the article are not WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth. BEFORE, including on Serbian Wikipedia, showed no sources that meet WP:SIGCOV.  // Timothy ::  talk  09:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  09:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  09:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  09:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep. Head of the (predecessor of) the country's main Military Medical Academy is a strong claim of notability, and I now properly formatted the main source in the article, the monograph of the academy . As far as I can see, the sources in the article meet WP:RS with flying colors. I grant that SIGCOV is iffy, but the short bio in the monograph and several shorter mentions elsewhere are sufficient to establish a short article. No such user (talk) 10:39, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I feel like the position might be high enough to qualify as notable. Although, I'm not claiming to know what guideline it would be under, but maybe it's similar to the notability of positions for academics. That said, I'm leaning toward weak delete due to the iffy sourcing and lack of SIGCOV. I'd be fine going in the direction of keep if quality sources are found though. --Adamant1 (talk) 18:58, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep for the reasons put forward by User:No such user. A Google search of the subject shows relevant and reliable sources, but granted it takes a bit of digging. Curbon7 (talk) 23:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep He was a notable local figure.  Sadkσ  (talk is cheap)  03:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.